Proposition 36 - Understanding the New California Laws on
Drug and Theft Offenses
A new law significantly altering drug- and theft-related
offenses in California is now in place.
On December 18, 2024, Proposition 36, the
"Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act," took effect.
The initiative aims to address homelessness, addiction, and theft through a new
approach to prosecution and sentencing.
Prop. 36 fundamentally reshapes California's legal landscape
regarding drug and theft crimes. A key change involves the introduction of
"wobbler" offenses—crimes that can be charged as either felonies or
misdemeanors, depending on various factors. Two new wobbler offenses are now
defined: possession of a hard drug (including fentanyl, heroin, cocaine,
methamphetamine, phencyclidine, and their analogs) with two prior drug-related
convictions (Health and Safety Code section 11395), and petty theft or
shoplifting with two prior theft-related convictions (Penal Code section
666.1).
Sentencing for these wobblers varies. A first offense
usually results in county jail time, while subsequent offenses may lead to
state prison sentences. Importantly, there are no age limits or time
restrictions on prior convictions that could qualify an individual for these
enhanced charges. An arrest on either the drug or theft felony charge
necessitates DNA collection, as well as a review by a judge assessing the
defendant's risk to public safety to any pre-trial release from jail. For the
treatment mandated felony found in the Health and Safety Code section 1395, the
offender can opt for drug treatment to avoid jail or prison time, and if they
complete treatment, they do not suffer a conviction for the offense. These
changes represent a significant shift in California's approach to prosecuting
specific crimes.
Beyond the new wobbler offenses, Prop. 36 significantly
increases penalties for fentanyl trafficking, especially large-scale
operations, and imposes stricter sentences for drug dealing involving firearms.
This reflects a determined effort to combat the opioid crisis and highlights
the serious dangers associated with drug trafficking. The new law also mandates
that courts explicitly warn convicted hard drug dealers of potential murder
charges if someone dies due to their drug trafficking activities—a
"Watson-style" advisement intended to deter such dangerous behavior.
The Watson advisement has been used in DUI cases to tell those convicted of a
DUI that they can be charged with murder if they drive under the influence, and
someone dies as a result.
Regarding property crimes, the new law allows for the
aggregation of stolen property value from multiple thefts. This means that
multiple smaller thefts can be combined to determine if the overall value meets
the felony threshold. Prop. 36 also increases penalties for property crimes
resulting in losses exceeding $50,000 and for crimes involving multiple perpetrators.
These changes aim to deter large-scale property crime and organized criminal
activity. The overall effect of these provisions is a more robust and
comprehensive approach to prosecuting drug and theft offenses in California.
The implications of Prop. 36 are far-reaching for the
public. It emphasizes treatment for drug-related offenses, recognizing
addiction as a health issue requiring treatment, not just punishment.
Simultaneously, it adopts a stricter stance on repeat offenders, utilizing the wobbler
provisions and increased penalties as deterrents. The judicial review process
built into the wobbler offenses ensures individualized assessments, balancing
public safety with fair and proportionate treatment for offenders.
In conclusion, Prop. 36 fundamentally reshapes California's
approach to drug and theft crimes, aiming to address societal issues while
implementing harsher penalties for repeat offenders. Understanding these
changes is crucial for navigating this updated legal landscape. For more
information, please read the attached informational bulletin and for specific
legal advice or questions about your circumstances, please consult a legal
professional.
No comments:
Post a Comment