A long and intriguing search string i took the initiative in creating the internet captured line 55 on the list of the top searched Google items today. I also want to know who crated Internet, or at least who claimed that publicly.
The Fact
In was Al Gore, who has made statements that he took the initiative in creating the Internet during television interview with CNN host Wolf Blitzer that was aired on March 9, 1999.
Details
Vice President Gore was not yet a formal candidate for the presidency at the time, but was clearly setting the stage for it, and Blitzer’s questions focused on his potential campaign. At one point, Blitzer asked Gore why the Democrats should support him over rival Bill Bradley. Gore answered, "Well, I will -- I’ll be offering my vision when my campaign begins, and it’ll be comprehensive and sweeping, and I hope that it’ll be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be. But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I’ve traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."
Some of the emails criticizing Gore for this statement point out that Gore has often shown ignorance about computers, so how could he have created the Internet? He did not claim, however, to be a computer geek who toiled in his basement and came up with the idea. He did claim that somehow as a member of congress he not only played in role in creating the Internet, but "took the initiative" to do it.
To his credit, Al Gore has participated in advancing information technology. As a Senator in the 1980s Gore urged government agencies to consolidate what at the time were several dozen different and unconnected networks into an "Interagency Network." Working in a bi-partisan manner with officials in Ronald Reagan and George Bush’s administrations, Gore secured the passage of the High Performance Computing and Communications Act in 1991. This "Gore Act" supported the National Research and Education Network (NREN) initiative that became one of the major vehicles for the spread of the Internet beyond the field of computer science. But all that is still far away from the Internet invention.
According to the encyclopedia Britannica, the Internet dates back to at least 1973 and in an article that broke the Gore story, Declan McCullagh of Wired News says the Net goes back as far as 1967 when Al gore was 19 years old. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency started experimenting with ways to allow networked computers to link and communicate. It was called The Internetting project and the ultimate system became known as The Internet. "Gore played no positive role in the decisions that led to the creation of the Internet as it now exists -- that is, in the opening of the Internet to commercial traffic," said Steve Allen, vice president for communications at the conservative Progress and Freedom Foundation.
Controversy
However, if the claim was purely false, why it did not bring the journalists attention immediately? At the time Gore made his statement, it received no attention whatever. Blitzer didn’t ask Gore to explain his remark; he showed no surprise at what Gore had said. And in its on-air promotions for the taped interview, CNN showed no sign of thinking that Gore had “made news” with his comment. Meanwhile, major papers which covered Gore’s interview completely ignored the comment. Why did Gore’s comment provoke no reaction? Perhaps because Blitzer and others knew that Gore had taken the leadership, within the Congress, on certain stages of the technology developing what we now call the Internet.
For example, the Washington Post’s first reference to the Internet occurred in November 1988; a “virus” had attacked the little-known network, which connected some 50,000 computers, the Post said. But as journalists began to report on the Net, Gore’s key role in its development was clear. One month later, for example, Martin Walker wrote this in The Guardian:
WALKER (12/30/88): American computing scientists are campaigning for the creation of a “superhighway” which would revolutionize data transmission. Legislation has already been laid before Congress by Senator Albert Gore of Tennessee, calling for government funds to help establish the new network, which scientists say they can have working within five years, at a cost of Dollars 400 million.
Since 1993, Gore has become one of the most prominent people in the Clinton administration on issues related to high technology. He hosts visiting businessmen and takes pride in personally announcing new technology initiatives such as Internet II funding. He also took the lead in supporting the Clipper Chip and continued restrictions on the overseas shipments of encryption products.
Political Implications
Completely ignored at the time it was made, it became an iconic example of an alleged character problem-Gore’s widely-flogged “problem with the truth.” For two years, Gore would be savaged as a liar-many pundits would call him “delusional”-and his Internet comment would be Exhibit A in their endless assault on his character and integrity. There are just some lines from the press:
***
MITTELSTADT: Vice President Al Gore’s claim that he is the father of the Internet drew amused protests Thursday from congressional Republicans.
***
John McCaslin, 3/16/99: [T]he Gore 2000 campaign…office has already gotten a taste of what it’s in for after Mr. Gore recently took credit for inventing the Internet.
Ralph Z. Hallow, 3/16/99: Relaxed and ready to enjoy his second and better-prepared go at the GOP nomination, [Steve Forbes] joked in an interview yesterday about Vice President Al Gore’s claim of having invented the Internet.
***
Rowan Scarborough, 3/16/99: “This one is going to stick,” said William Kristol, editor and publisher of the conservative Weekly Standard. ‘Al Gore. Inventor of the Internet.’”
***
Editorial, 3/18/99: Mr. Gore has some explaining to do to parents. As everyone now knows, Mr. Gore invented the Internet, which means the vice president is responsible for making hard-core pornography available to elementary schoolchildren at the local library.
***
Robert Tyrell, 3/19/99: Did you hear Trent Lott is claiming to have invented the paper clip? Some think he is making a joke at the expense of Al Gore’s megalomaniacal claims about inventing the Internet.
Conclusion
There is no doubt that Al Gore indeed played a significant role in the Internet culture and infrastructure development in the United States. The entire buzz was caused by the vague phrased statement that allowed wide interpretation of its underground meanings. While there was never any official explanation or clarification by Al Gore as to why he made the claim, but he did have a sense of humor about it. At a meeting of Democratic leaders, he said, “I was pretty tired when I made that comment because I had been up very late the night before inventing the camcorder."
Sources and Additional Information:
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/g/goreinternet.htm
http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh120302.shtml
http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/03/18390
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200009/msg00052.html
Monday, February 23, 2009
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Do you really need new Amazon Kindle 2?
Buzz in the online community has been driven today by Amazon presenting the latest generation of its Wireless Reading Device - Kindle 2. This item will be released on February 24, 2009, but you can pre-order it now, as it will be shipped on first come - first served basis. The price $359 includes free shipping. The current electronic portable reading devices fans seem to be excited on the new product.
Listed Characteristics:
1. Slim: Just over 1/3 of an inch, as thin as most magazines.
2. Lightweight: At 10.2 ounces, lighter than a typical paperback.
3. Wireless: 3G wireless lets you download books right from your Kindle, anytime, anywhere; no monthly fees, service plans, or hunting for Wi-Fi hotspots.
4. Books in Under 60 Seconds: Get books delivered in less than 60 seconds; no PC required.
5. Improved Display: Reads like real paper; now boasts 16 shades of gray for clear text and even crisper images.
6. Longer Battery Life: 25% longer battery life; read for days without recharging.
7. More Storage: Take your library with you; holds over 1,500 books.
8. Faster Page Turns: 20% faster page turns.
9. Read-to-Me: With the new Text-to-Speech feature, Kindle can read every book, blog, magazine, and newspaper out loud to you.
10. Large Selection: Over 230,000 books plus U.S. and international newspapers, magazines, and blogs available.
11. Low Book Prices: New York Times Best Sellers and New Releases $9.99, unless marked otherwise.
In comparison with the existing version, the software has been updated in many ways to reflect the firmware improvements. Some of the content, like newspaper articles, has also seen an update to make it easier to navigate and get a quick feel for a story. Music and Web browsing still reside in the "Experimental" section, and are joined by the new text-to-speech feature. The biggest feature, software-wise, seems to be the new, "Whispersync" feature, which can be triggered with a menu command. This will get both a user’s content and location within it-book and page-coordinated between different Kindles.
Video Presentation:
The Kindle 2 is a far superior device to the first iteration.
The Kindle 2 has enormous potential market.
The Kindle 2 replacing paper books.
The Kindle 2 - computer for smart readers.
These are just several of the titles related to the new device appearance on the market. But, I am somehow not completely convinced yet. Here are some of the reasons for me to be skeptical on the Kindle 2 device future:
Listed Characteristics:
1. Slim: Just over 1/3 of an inch, as thin as most magazines.
2. Lightweight: At 10.2 ounces, lighter than a typical paperback.
3. Wireless: 3G wireless lets you download books right from your Kindle, anytime, anywhere; no monthly fees, service plans, or hunting for Wi-Fi hotspots.
4. Books in Under 60 Seconds: Get books delivered in less than 60 seconds; no PC required.
5. Improved Display: Reads like real paper; now boasts 16 shades of gray for clear text and even crisper images.
6. Longer Battery Life: 25% longer battery life; read for days without recharging.
7. More Storage: Take your library with you; holds over 1,500 books.
8. Faster Page Turns: 20% faster page turns.
9. Read-to-Me: With the new Text-to-Speech feature, Kindle can read every book, blog, magazine, and newspaper out loud to you.
10. Large Selection: Over 230,000 books plus U.S. and international newspapers, magazines, and blogs available.
11. Low Book Prices: New York Times Best Sellers and New Releases $9.99, unless marked otherwise.
In comparison with the existing version, the software has been updated in many ways to reflect the firmware improvements. Some of the content, like newspaper articles, has also seen an update to make it easier to navigate and get a quick feel for a story. Music and Web browsing still reside in the "Experimental" section, and are joined by the new text-to-speech feature. The biggest feature, software-wise, seems to be the new, "Whispersync" feature, which can be triggered with a menu command. This will get both a user’s content and location within it-book and page-coordinated between different Kindles.
Video Presentation:
The Kindle 2 is a far superior device to the first iteration.
The Kindle 2 has enormous potential market.
The Kindle 2 replacing paper books.
The Kindle 2 - computer for smart readers.
These are just several of the titles related to the new device appearance on the market. But, I am somehow not completely convinced yet. Here are some of the reasons for me to be skeptical on the Kindle 2 device future:
- I personally like to read. I like to flip pages and keep the bed side book all the time. Can Kindle replace that completely? I doubt so.
- OK, the first one was emotional, and you can disregard that. Kindle is more convenient and handy. You cannot carry 1,500 paper books with you all the time. That is quite clear. But why the modern mini-computers cannot fill the niche? Just couple of months ago, I purchased mini-computer Asus, which can do whatever Kindle can do, and much more: full Windows XP functionality with entertainment package - work with Office, surf internet, read books, video-chat on Skype, watch movies, play games. The dimensions are almost the same as Kindle. The Asus storage is 160 GB versus 2 GB at Kindle. So, what is the point to get device with limited functionality?
- Price, price, price… Kindle appeared to be pricier than my new notebook ($300). So why pay extra for excellent, but single-purpose system?
Friday, January 30, 2009
Google Bomb Linking Miserable Failure to the President Barack Obama
The terms Google bomb and Googlewashing refer to
practices intended to influence the ranking
of particular pages, in results returned by the Google search engine.
Wikipedia
Searches for Google Bombs came to the leading positions in the Google Trends, when that became clear that Barack Obama inherited them from the predecessor, George Bush. It is interesting to see, how easy it is to manipulate searches positioning if needed. Foxnews article below also has some political taste, which is just spicing the content, however I have to admit that the facts mostly support the offered assessment. Still, there are possible additional explanations on why the Obama clearance took much faster than Bush clearance. My be, Google has acquired recently new IP or developed new technology, allowing to eliminate Google Bomb threat much faster than before. Who knows?
***
A Google search of ’miserable failure’ now returns Web sites about the Googlebombs rather than the original pages that were returned.
It took four years for Google to address the "Google bomb" that was lobbed at former President Bush.
But it took the Internet behemoth only a few days to defuse the same attack on President Obama.
Four years versus a few days ... Some Googlers are asking why.
In 2003, President Bush’s detractors successfully gamed the Google search engine by arranging to have countless Web sites link the words "miserable failure" to Bush’s official biography on the White House Web site.
The result was that when someone typed the search term "miserable failure" into the Google search box, Bush’s bio rose to the top of the search results.
And that’s how it stayed until 2007, when Google developed an algorithm to detect what became known as "Google bombs" and re-directed the term "miserable failure" to non-political pages.
Unfortunately for Obama, "miserable failure" reverted back to his bio when he moved into the White House. The new president was also Google-bombed with the phrase "cheerful achievement."
But this time, Google stepped in quickly, rectifying the situation in a few days, instead of four years.
The difference in time did not go unnoticed.
"You let this go on for the entire Bush administration," a reader named w3bgrrl wrote on a Google blog. "But since you bought the White House for Obama, you don’t want your candidates harmed ... And your claims not withstanding, even liberals know you’re liberal."
But another writer, Mikkel deMib Svendsen, gave Google the benefit of the doubt.
"I do think many of [Google employees] are liberals but I am also 100% confident that the large majority of them are also very professional people that take the job of creating a good and unbiased search engine very, very seriously," he wrote.
Google itself said the reason it took only a few days to redirect Obama’s Google bomb was that, this time, it already had the algorithm in place.
"Though the spirit of change may be in the air in Washington, some things apparently stay the same," Google software engineer Matt Cutts wrote on a Google blog. "After we became aware of this latest Googlebomb, we re-ran our algorithm and it detected the Googlebomb for [cheerful achievement] as well as for [failure]. As a result, those search queries now return discussion about the Google bombs, rather than the original pages that were returned."
In another company blog, Google software engineers Ryan Moulton and Kendre Carattini wrote that the "pranks" aren’t a very high priority for the company.
"But over time, we’ve seen more people assume that they are Google’s opinion, or that Google has hand-coded the results for these Googlebombed queries," they wrote. "That’s not true, and it seemed like it was worth trying to correct that misperception."
Danny Sullivan, editor-in-chief of Search Engine Land, says Google could have acted even faster in Obama’s case, and that he was "disappointed" that the Internet giant did not act preemptively last week.
"They knew this was an issue before the inauguration, but it wasn’t until after it happened that [Google] finally got to it and said, ’We better re-run our system,’" Sullivan told FOXNews.com.
"I know there are bigger issues to worry about," he said. "But then again, people turn to search engines to try and find information and this is the kind of thing you want them to be paying attention to as part of an overall communication strategy."
Sullivan likened Google bombing to a "neighborhood kid spray-painting on your wall," and he said he expects these kinds of digital antics to continue.
"It’s probably going to be an inevitable fact of life for politicians moving forward to see themselves involved in these types of pranks," he said. "But you don’t want to go around reacting too much, either."
Asked if he thought Google’s reaction to the Bush and Obama Google bombs appeared to be biased, Sullivan replied, "I give them the benefit of the doubt. If you’re an Obama friend at Google, waiting until after he’s in office is not being a good friend."
According to an article by CNET News, the Obama "cheerful achievement" Google bomb was created by Montreal blogger Eric Baillargeon, who did not return requests for comment.
Obama spokesman Nicholas Shapiro declined to comment Thursday.
A Yahoo! search of "miserable failure," however, returns the official White House biographies of Obama and Bush, respectively. Company officials did not return a request for comment Friday.
***
While political Google Bombs are quite common, there are other types appearing here and there: commercial, promotional, competitive, and simply for fun.
Just look what you can get when you search for "French Military Victories"
PingPongPie created a list of the 10 most successful Google Bombs in the recent history:
10 successful Google Bombs that I’ve come across in recent years. Some of you may even remember them from when they were active. So in no particular order, we have:
1. “More evil than Satan himself” brought up the Microsoft homepage.
2. “Dumb motherfucker” linked to a site selling George W. Bush-related merchandise.
3. “Miserable failure” or “failure” on the 29th of September 2006 brought up the official George W. Bush biography.
4. In the run up to the 2005 UK election, “liar” linked to former Prime Minister Tony Blair.
5. A long-lasting and moderately successful bomb would be making the word “Scientology” link to Operation Clambake (www.xenu.net), an anti-scientology movement.
6. Another Scientology-related google bomb was born on the 29th of January 2008, when a google bomb linking the search “dangerous cult” to the homepage of The Church of Scientology was created.
7. Steven Lerner, the creator of Albino Blacksheep, created a joke webpage in 2003, which was titled “French Military Victories.” When searched for on Google, the top entry took you to a page that resembles google, but reads “Your search - French military victories - did not match any documents. Did you mean French military defeats?” This received over 50,000 hits in the first 18 hours of opening. Links near the top of the page lead to a simplified list of French military history. Even if you google “French military victories” now, it’s still the top result.
8. A bombing run targeting former US Senator Rick Santorum was embarked upon by columnist Dan Savage after the Senator made several controversial remarks towards homosexuality. The bombing was part of Savage’s plan to have the word “santorum” used for the combination of semen, lubricant and excrement that results from anal sex, and propelled the website created for that purpose to a high result for “santorum”.
9. Jewish writer Daniel Sieradski asked his blog readers to link to the Wikipedia article for “Jew” after he found that googling “Jew” returned the anti-Jewish website “Jew Watch” as the top entry. The bombing was a success and removed the site from the top result, but unfortunately Jew Watch still appears on the first page of results.
10. A search for “McDonald’s” was linked to the film Supersize Me, which was highly critical of the McDonald’s restaurant chain.
***
To understand how easy is to arrange the search engine steering to the wrong direction, there is simple instructions by Adam Mathes on how you can join the Google Bomb campaign, distributed on the web in 2001:
Here’s how you can join in the first ever international google bombing:
1. Get a web site. If you already have a web site, you can skip this step. If not, be a cheap bastard and go Geocities, Angelfire, Pitas, whatever. I don’t care. Everyone has something to say blah blah blah personal expression yadda yadda. Just remember the Google bombing.
2. Whenever you update your site, which should be approximately three to five times a week, be sure to include the following HTML at some point:
Andy <a href="http://www.ohmessylife.com">"talentless hack"</a> Pressman
3. Add your site to Google.
4. Wait for the magic to happen! Soon, whenever you type in talentless hack into google, you’ll see Andy "talentless hack" Pressman smiling right back at you.
-Adam Mathes, "Filler Friday: Google bombing," Ьber: Better Than You, Daily, April 6, 2001
Bomb generation infrastructure is presented below:
Sources and Additional Reading:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,485632,00.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb
http://www.pingpongpie.com/2008/06/10-successful-google-bombs/
http://www.wordspy.com/words/Googlebombing.asp
http://scio-sphere.blogspot.com/2007/02/google-bomb-from-bang-to-fizz.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)