SHADOWS OF BETRAYAL: How the Kremlin Manipulated U.S. Envoys to Dismantle Ukraine

 

In late November 2025, the veil was ripped away from a grotesque chapter of secret diplomacy. A bombshell leak of an October 14 transcript exposed how Vladimir Putin’s regime effectively hijacked U.S. peace efforts, turning American envoys into unwitting coaches for the Kremlin’s geopolitical games. The revelation details a backchannel conspiracy that sidelined the victims of the war—Ukraine—and handed the aggressors the keys to a negotiated surrender.

THE PUPPETEER’S SCRIPT: Russia’s Psychological Warfare

 

The leaked call between Steve Witkoff—Donald Trump’s special envoy—and Yuri Ushakov, Putin’s chief foreign policy manipulator, was not a negotiation; it was a tutorial in ego-stroking.

• The Kremlin’s Playbook: The transcript reveals Witkoff coaching the Russian official on exactly how to manipulate the U.S. President. The strategy? Flattery over substance. Russia was advised to stroke Trump’s ego regarding his Middle East deals to grease the wheels for a Ukrainian capitulation.
• Calculated Malice: While Russian missiles continued to rain down on Ukrainian civilians, the Kremlin’s diplomats were coolly discussing how to exploit American political dynamics to secure a victory they could not win on the battlefield.

 

THE "PEACE PLAN": A Blueprint for Subjugation

 

The origins of this diplomatic travesty trace back to a shadowed meeting in Miami with Kirill Dmitriev, the head of Russia’s Direct Investment Fund and Putin’s economic henchman. The resulting 28-point proposal was not a compromise—it was a Russian Wish List written in Ukrainian blood.

• Dismembering a Nation: The Kremlin’s demands are absolute: the permanent annexation of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia.
• Demilitarization & Defenselessness: The plan demands Ukraine strip its military and renounce NATO forever, leaving it defenseless against future Russian aggression.
• The Ultimatum: In a display of imperial arrogance, this "take-it-or-leave-it" demand was thrust upon Kyiv just before Thanksgiving, blindsiding the very nation fighting for its survival.

 

THE "K" CONNECTION: Weaponizing Information

 

The malice of the Russian state extended beyond the talks and into information warfare. When Witkoff accidentally tweeted, "He must have got this from K..." regarding a leak of the plan, the finger pointed squarely at Kirill Dmitriev.
This suggests a sinister tactic: The Kremlin likely leaked its own draconian demands to psychologically break Ukrainian resolve and force the hand of Western allies, all while feigning innocence and blaming "globalist plots" in their state-controlled propaganda outlets like Pravda.

 

THE FALLOUT: The West Fractured, The Aggressor Rewarded

 

The implications are damning. While American officials like Marco Rubio scramble to claim authorship of the plan, the reality suggests the Russian government dictated the terms.

• Allies Betrayed: European leaders and Ukrainian officials were left in the dark, forced to scramble a desperate counter-proposal in Geneva while Washington whispered with Moscow.
• Zelenskyy’s Stand: President Zelenskyy rejected the proposal outright, recognizing it for what it was: capitulation disguised as diplomacy.
• The Kremlin’s Victory: Regardless of the outcome, Russia has succeeded in sowing chaos, eroding trust between the U.S. and Ukraine, and validating its belief that Western resolve can be bought, flattered, or manipulated away.

The "Spirit of Anchorage" invoked by Trump isn't peace—it is the spirit of appeasement. As negotiations stall, the Russian government stands exposed not as a partner for peace, but as a predatory entity willing to manipulate the highest levels of U.S. government to secure its conquest.

Angelina Jolie on Russian Crimes!

 

The human safari is a Russian campaign of deliberate terrorism against civilians in Kherson, Ukraine. Russian military units, since May 2024, utilize drones to purposefully target Ukrainian civilians during the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. Due to these actions, a UN report concluded there was a high probability that the Russian Armed Forces was guilty of murder, forced transfer, terror, attacks on civilians and outrages upon personal dignity which amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity. A Human Rights Watch (HRW) report concurred and found Russian armed forces guilty of attacks on civilians, murder and terror as war crimes and crimes against humanity (Wikipedia)

 

American actress and UN Goodwill Ambassador Angelina Jolie stated that she faced a constant, palpable drone threat during her visits to the southern Ukrainian cities of Mykolaiv and Kherson, adding that her group paused while a drone passed overhead, according to her Instagram post on November 9, 2025.

 

In her own words:

 

“I visited Mykolaiv and Kherson in Ukraine this week to meet families living on the frontline. The threat of drones was a constant, heavy presence. You hear a low hum in the sky. It’s become known locally as a ‘human safari’, with drones used to track, hunt and terrorize people, constantly. There was a moment when we had to pause and wait while a drone flew overhead. I was in protective gear, and for me, it was just a couple of days. The families here live with this every single day.”

 

“The people of Mykolaiv and Kherson live with danger every day, but they refuse to give in. At a time when governments around the world are turning their backs on the protection of civilians, their strength, and their support for each other is humbling. After nearly four years of conflict, exhaustion is visible, yet so too is determination. Families want safety, peace, and the chance to rebuild their lives.”

Why Hamas Should Lay Down Its Weapons — and Why Hamas Refuses to Do So?

 

Part 1 — Why Hamas Refuses to Lay Down Its Weapons

There is no single reason — it is a mix of ideology, political calculation, and survival strategy.

1. Ideological Commitment

• Hamas was founded in 1987 with a mission it has never renounced: to “liberate all of historical Palestine” and to reject the existence of the State of Israel.
• Even after softening some political language in 2017, the group still officially refuses to recognize Israel and views armed struggle as a sacred duty.
• Laying down arms would mean abandoning the very core of its identity and purpose.

2. Power and Control

• Hamas has ruled the Gaza Strip since 2007, after seizing it from the rival Palestinian party Fatah.
• If it disarmed, it would likely lose:
• Political control over Gaza, and
• Much of its public support as a self-proclaimed “resistance movement.”
• For Hamas, disarming equals losing both control and legitimacy.

3. Foreign Support

• Hamas receives military and financial backing from Iran, Hezbollah, and other regional allies.
• These actors see Hamas as a useful instrument to pressure Israel and weaken Western influence in the Middle East.
• They have little incentive to see Hamas lay down its weapons.

4. Fear and Survival

• Hamas leaders know that surrendering their weapons offers no guarantee of safety, amnesty, or political future.
• They fear total destruction by Israel if they disarm unconditionally.
• As a result, Hamas continues to fight, hoping that international pressure will eventually force Israel into a ceasefire or political compromise.

---

Part 2 — Why Hamas Should Lay Down Its Weapons

1. To End Civilian Suffering

• Every round of conflict between Hamas and Israel brings devastating civilian casualties — particularly in Gaza’s densely populated neighborhoods.
• Disarming would allow ceasefires to hold, humanitarian aid to flow freely, and homes, hospitals, and schools to be rebuilt.
• As long as Hamas continues its fight, Gaza’s civilians will continue to bear the greatest suffering.

2. To Rebuild Gaza and Restore Hope

• The international community — including the U.N., EU, Arab League, and United States — has made clear that no large-scale reconstruction can begin while Hamas remains armed.
• Disarmament would unlock billions of dollars in aid, create jobs, and allow infrastructure recovery.
• It would also reopen Gaza to international trade and investment, ending isolation and economic blockade.

3. To Gain Political Legitimacy

• Hamas is currently listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S., EU, Canada, and others.
• Laying down arms under verified international supervision could begin a political transformation similar to the path once taken by the IRA in Northern Ireland or the PLO.
• Such a shift could allow Hamas to participate in legitimate governance instead of permanent conflict.

4. To Protect Future Generations

• The ongoing cycle of revenge and militarization traps Gaza’s youth in a state of endless war.
• Ending armed struggle would give Palestinian children a future built on education, safety, and opportunity — not violence.
• It would also lower the risk of another devastating regional war.

5. To Strengthen the Palestinian Cause

• Many Arab and Muslim nations — including Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia — support Palestinian statehood but reject Hamas’s militant approach.
• Disarming would allow Palestinians to unite under a single diplomatic leadership and present a stronger, credible case for recognition at the United Nations.
• Peaceful unity could achieve far more for Palestinian independence than continued armed resistance.

6. To Avoid Total Destruction

• Israel’s declared military objective since 2023 has been the elimination of Hamas.
• Continued resistance only ensures more destruction of Gaza and loss of life, without shifting the military balance.
• Laying down weapons could preserve what remains of Gaza’s infrastructure and population, and possibly secure the survival of Hamas members through negotiation.

7. To Open the Door to Lasting Peace

• Disarmament would allow credible peace talks with international guarantees — involving Arab mediators, the United Nations, and Western powers.
• It is the only realistic step that could bring security to both Palestinians and Israelis and create the foundation for a future Palestinian state.

---

Part 3 — Documented and Alleged War Crimes by Hamas

As a final reminder, Hamas and its affiliated operatives bear direct responsibility for numerous documented or alleged war crimes, as confirmed by international investigations and human rights organizations.

1. Deliberate Attacks on Civilians

• The October 7, 2023 attacks on Israeli communities deliberately targeted civilians, including children, women, and the elderly.
• Over 1,200 people were killed — mostly noncombatants.
• This violates Article 51 of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibits intentional attacks on civilians.

2. Massacres, Rape, and Torture

• Evidence collected by Israel, the U.N., and human rights groups shows acts of torture, sexual violence, and mutilation during and after the attacks.
• These actions qualify as war crimes and crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

3. Taking Civilian Hostages

• Hamas captured more than 250 hostages, including children and the elderly, using them as political leverage.
• Hostage-taking constitutes a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and is explicitly prohibited under international law.

4. Using Human Shields

• Hamas has repeatedly placed military assets near or inside civilian facilities — including schools, hospitals, mosques, and residential buildings — across Gaza.
• This violates Article 28 of the Fourth Geneva Convention and is recognized as a war crime.

5. Indiscriminate Rocket Fire

• Since 2001, Hamas has fired tens of thousands of unguided rockets toward Israeli cities such as Tel Aviv, Ashkelon, and Sderot.
• These attacks fail to distinguish between military and civilian targets, breaching the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law.

6. Executing Political Opponents

• Within Gaza, Hamas has executed alleged collaborators and political rivals without due process.
• Such extrajudicial killings violate international human rights law.

7. Recruiting and Using Child Soldiers

• Multiple U.N. reports accuse Hamas of indoctrinating and training minors for combat or propaganda.
• Recruiting children under 15 into armed conflict is a war crime under international law.

8. Obstructing Humanitarian Aid

• Hamas has interfered with humanitarian relief efforts, seized aid supplies, and used civilians as leverage in negotiations.
• Such actions violate Article 23 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which protects the right to free passage of humanitarian assistance.

---

Conclusion

Hamas’s continued militarization sustains a tragic cycle of violence that devastates both Palestinians and Israelis.
Disarmament — under international supervision and accompanied by credible political guarantees — offers the only realistic path toward reconstruction, reconciliation, and a lasting peace in Gaza and beyond.